Behind the name
Monday, April 28th, 2008Some friends of mine have asked about the reasons for this blog name change.
It’s due to my recent frustrations about the company I work with, the quality of its developers and the vendor lock-in they suffer AND sell.
It’s a general opinion that the project I’m working on was born old. Old technologies, old tools, old libraries.
Nevertheless the architecture is quite new (the SOA thing). At the time the project was plotted, SOA was really new.
So why have they chosen to stick on old tools?
Would you use the Apollo 11 to go to Mars? Nice job with the Moon, but Mars…
Ok, this can’t be a rule of thumb, but sticking on the “Never change a winning team” mantra is just the opposite, so, to me, it’s safe to consider some middle point alternatives.
At the time I was conspiring with my coworkers, looking for ways of giving the thing some fresh air, our beloved (!?) tourism minister, Francesco Rutelli, was magnifying the italian monuments and I was thinking: “Are monuments (and pasta) the only thing we offer to the world market? Wait! I’m working with tools and libs so old that they look just like monuments!!”
So I’ve decided: no more monuments.
Technologically speaking, you can read that as “no big names” or “no corporations”.
Feasible? I’m doing it, so, yes it is. BTW, what do you expect from a penguin like me?